Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"
(cleanup of old discussions on: TMS, contact information, initial wiki problems, deleting, spammers, information gathering, future changes, lord wiki, pulse request, map requests, room descriptions) |
(→Category label in pages: new section) |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
We can change what links appear in that navigation panel on the left side of the screen. Suggestions? I don't want to make it too cluttered, so just a few choice links that would be more useful than "donations" or "random page" [[User:Waite|Waite]] 10:59, 11 May 2007 (CDT) | We can change what links appear in that navigation panel on the left side of the screen. Suggestions? I don't want to make it too cluttered, so just a few choice links that would be more useful than "donations" or "random page" [[User:Waite|Waite]] 10:59, 11 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Category label in pages == | ||
+ | |||
+ | i've noticed some items have "Category:" in front of their name and others of similar status or type do not. for example, classes ("Category:Psionicists") have it while most races do not. looking at my watchlist i noticed because it puts Firedrakes in the "Main" list, whereas pages like Imps, Psionicists, and Transfigured Forest show up under the "Category" list. | ||
+ | |||
+ | just wondering what the details are; is there an in-progress movement to move towards or away from using "Category:" with the names? or some such... | ||
+ | --[[User:3nki|3nki]] 19:12, 3 August 2011 (CDT) |
Revision as of 20:12, 3 August 2011
Contents
Signing your entries in talk pages
I'm not sure where the best place to put this is, but I want to remind everybody to sign their entries in talk pages, two dashes followed by 4 tildes '--~~~~' or just click the button that is second from the right on the top of the edit box. --Mel 10:15, 12 Jan 2006 (EST)
- Also, when you're replying to something on a talk page, feel free to use this fancy feature (watch start of line)
- It works really well! just add one colon (:) at the start of the lines more than the previous reply had! --Llanor 17:30, 5 February 2007 (CST)
Creating new pages
(Sorry if you don't like that I deleted all the discussion from before on this subject, but you were talking nonsense.) In the Search box, type the exact title you wish to use for your wiki page and press 'Go'. If this page doesn't exist yet, the option 'Create This Page' will be clearly visible after you've pressed 'Go'. Click that. Wow, it's that simple. --Llanor 17:17, 5 February 2007 (CST)
Contact Information
It may be helpful to provide some means of contacting those folks in charge of this site.
- If you really want to contact a user of this wiki, just edit their talk page.
Some custom insertion buttons
See all those edit buttons above the edit box? It would be nice if some of those pertained to the Avatar Wiki. For example, it's monotonous to code a bunch of mob/object/area emplates for however many pages you have to do, so some buttons could add those templates, appropriately hyperlinked, into the editbox for us to use. Giving us one-click access to template code would also help standardize the page layouts. If you're interested, the appropriate code lies in EditPage.php (all the way at the bottom). --Neyne 20:59, 1 March 2006 (EST)
We can change what links appear in that navigation panel on the left side of the screen. Suggestions? I don't want to make it too cluttered, so just a few choice links that would be more useful than "donations" or "random page" Waite 10:59, 11 May 2007 (CDT)
Category label in pages
i've noticed some items have "Category:" in front of their name and others of similar status or type do not. for example, classes ("Category:Psionicists") have it while most races do not. looking at my watchlist i noticed because it puts Firedrakes in the "Main" list, whereas pages like Imps, Psionicists, and Transfigured Forest show up under the "Category" list.
just wondering what the details are; is there an in-progress movement to move towards or away from using "Category:" with the names? or some such... --3nki 19:12, 3 August 2011 (CDT)