Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Area Quick-Links"
| Line 156: | Line 156: | ||
:I like the third one, out of the 4 total. But with a minor change, we should lose the bold fond on 'Maps'. And the link in the header can be taken out, since it's in the first column already. Aside from those two minor things, it's perfect. --[[User:MooNFisH|Llanor]] 18:47, 8 February 2007 (CST) | :I like the third one, out of the 4 total. But with a minor change, we should lose the bold fond on 'Maps'. And the link in the header can be taken out, since it's in the first column already. Aside from those two minor things, it's perfect. --[[User:MooNFisH|Llanor]] 18:47, 8 February 2007 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Ah, okay. True, it is a bit redundant to have two links; but it does make it consistent with the other tables. Also, what's wrong with the bold? --[[User:DaveGarber1975|Dave Garber]] 18:56, 8 February 2007 (CST) | ||
== Or Maybe This? == | == Or Maybe This? == | ||
Revision as of 19:56, 8 February 2007
A modest proposal for MooNFisH, master of Templates...
| Areas: | Lawful | Special | Maps: | Grandfathered | |||
| 01-10 | 11-20 | 21-30 | 31-40 | 41-50 | Hero | Grandfathered | |
| Mobs: | Types | Auras | Flags | Grandfathered | |||
| Objects: | Types | Values | Flags | Grandfathered | |||
| Rooms: | Types | Terrains | Exits | Doors | |||
Hmmm, what do you think? --Dave Garber 22:01, 7 February 2007 (CST)
Here's a modest proposal for Dave Garber, master of negotiation :P
Something different
| Areas: | Lawful | Special | Maps | |||||||||
| 01-10 | 11-20 | 21-30 | 31-40 | 41-50 | Hero | |||||||
| Mobs: | Types | Auras | Flags | |||||||||
| Objects: | Types | Values | Flags | |||||||||
| Rooms: | Types | Terrains | Exits | Doors | ||||||||
| Grandfathered: | Maps | Areas | Mobs | Gear | ||||||||
I mean, I didn't like the big Grandfathered at the rightmost side of the table. And since I made it a bit less wide, I thought I'd compensate for that. --Llanor 05:09, 8 February 2007 (CST)
And Now for Something Completely Different (Well, Not Really)
Ah! Yeah, I can understand that. My thoughts are either (1) to experiment with your suggestion above a bit more and to submit a third proposal that may be even better than both of ours above or (2) to eliminate the rightmost column of my first proposal entirely like this...
| Areas: | 01-10 | 11-20 | 21-30 | 31-40 | 41-50 | Hero |
| Lawful | Special | Maps | ||||
| Mobs: | Types | Auras | Flags | |||
| Objects: | Types | Values | Flags | |||
| Rooms: | Types | Terrains | Exits & Doors | |||
Or, perhaps even better, this...
| Areas: | 01-10 | 11-20 | 21-30 | 31-40 | 41-50 | Hero | Maps |
| Lawful | Special | ||||||
| Mobs: | Types | Auras | Flags | ||||
| Objects: | Types | Values | Flags | ||||
| Rooms: | Types | Terrains | Exits & Doors | ||||
This table doesn't necessarily have to include every category. I'm wondering if Grandfathered stuff would best be included in this table or if it would be best left off. What do you think? --Dave Garber 15:30, 8 February 2007 (CST)
The first one. And I don't think grandfathered gear needs to be in quick links, since it probably isn't a very frequented category.--Neyne 18:17, 8 February 2007 (CST)
- I like the third one, out of the 4 total. But with a minor change, we should lose the bold fond on 'Maps'. And the link in the header can be taken out, since it's in the first column already. Aside from those two minor things, it's perfect. --Llanor 18:47, 8 February 2007 (CST)
- Ah, okay. True, it is a bit redundant to have two links; but it does make it consistent with the other tables. Also, what's wrong with the bold? --Dave Garber 18:56, 8 February 2007 (CST)
Or Maybe This?
| Areas: | 01-10 | 11-20 | 21-30 | 31-40 | 41-50 | Hero | Mobs: | Types | Auras | Flags |
| Lawful | Special | Objects: | Types | Values | Flags | |||||
| Maps | Rooms: | Types | Terrains | Exits & Doors | ||||||
Hmmm, I just keep a-tinkerin'... --Dave Garber 18:53, 8 February 2007 (CST)
