Difference between revisions of "Template talk:S&S Quick-Links"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
:I used Arial Black, size 14, normal, no anti-aliasing, on a 40x15 jpg file, and then totated 90 deg clockwise (putting this here so I don't forget it for next time). | :I used Arial Black, size 14, normal, no anti-aliasing, on a 40x15 jpg file, and then totated 90 deg clockwise (putting this here so I don't forget it for next time). | ||
:You choose whether you like the small font better, or the images. Or maybe both. I don't like the way you did it.. Anyhow, small text doesn't fill the column, and an image can only link to itself, so I didn't know which would be better. --[[User:MooNFisH|Llanor]] 06:11, 8 February 2007 (CST) | :You choose whether you like the small font better, or the images. Or maybe both. I don't like the way you did it.. Anyhow, small text doesn't fill the column, and an image can only link to itself, so I didn't know which would be better. --[[User:MooNFisH|Llanor]] 06:11, 8 February 2007 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Ah! *lol* Yes, it does look much much much nicer with either of your suggestions--either the small font or the images. I'm not sure which of these two I like better at this moment; I'm leaning toward the small font because it would take less work to change as new classes are added but I'm not sure. Thanks for your corrections! I considered sorting these classes alphabetically; however, I also thought that people who are considering a PRC might want to see which skills they would gain/lose if they did so--and that grouping these classes together would make this comparison easier. But, after more thought, you're right--alphabetizing them would be better, overall. Perhaps background color could be used somehow to group PRCs together with their core class; hmmm... *scratchhead* --[[User:DaveGarber1975|Dave Garber]] 15:48, 8 February 2007 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 17:48, 8 February 2007
Yet another modest proposal for MooNFisH, master of Templates...
| Skills & Spells |
arc | fus | asn | bzk | cle | dru | mag | stm | wzd | mon | shf | pal | prs | psi | mnd | rog | bci | bld | sor | war | bod |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Lowmort: | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| Hero: | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
Hmmm, what do you think? --Dave Garber 02:02, 8 February 2007 (CST)
- Ewww, ugly (no offense). Made some images because it looks better. Also.. ASS -> ASN, and PRI -> PRS. And I hope you don't mind I put them all in alphabetical order, instead of sorted by prc. I mean, it's easier to find something when listed alpbabetically.
- I used Arial Black, size 14, normal, no anti-aliasing, on a 40x15 jpg file, and then totated 90 deg clockwise (putting this here so I don't forget it for next time).
- You choose whether you like the small font better, or the images. Or maybe both. I don't like the way you did it.. Anyhow, small text doesn't fill the column, and an image can only link to itself, so I didn't know which would be better. --Llanor 06:11, 8 February 2007 (CST)
- Ah! *lol* Yes, it does look much much much nicer with either of your suggestions--either the small font or the images. I'm not sure which of these two I like better at this moment; I'm leaning toward the small font because it would take less work to change as new classes are added but I'm not sure. Thanks for your corrections! I considered sorting these classes alphabetically; however, I also thought that people who are considering a PRC might want to see which skills they would gain/lose if they did so--and that grouping these classes together would make this comparison easier. But, after more thought, you're right--alphabetizing them would be better, overall. Perhaps background color could be used somehow to group PRCs together with their core class; hmmm... *scratchhead* --Dave Garber 15:48, 8 February 2007 (CST)
