Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Statistics"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I don't understand the table you added, Neyne. What do the values represent? You're distinguishing 'Prime Req' and 'Other'. I'm assuming by prime req you mean the primary stat for a certain class, and by other you mean the other four. And then, in order to raise the value from stat value A to stat value B, where B is listed in the colored part of the table, it costs what is listed below?<br> | I don't understand the table you added, Neyne. What do the values represent? You're distinguishing 'Prime Req' and 'Other'. I'm assuming by prime req you mean the primary stat for a certain class, and by other you mean the other four. And then, in order to raise the value from stat value A to stat value B, where B is listed in the colored part of the table, it costs what is listed below?<br> | ||
I'd say it'd make a lot more sense to specify the cost it would require to raise your stat from value A to value B, with A in the table above the cost to raise. But, again, I'm not sure which of the two you're using here. I like the idea of a table like this, though. --[[User:MooNFisH|Llanor]] 07:42, 15 February 2007 (CST) | I'd say it'd make a lot more sense to specify the cost it would require to raise your stat from value A to value B, with A in the table above the cost to raise. But, again, I'm not sure which of the two you're using here. I like the idea of a table like this, though. --[[User:MooNFisH|Llanor]] 07:42, 15 February 2007 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [[Prime Requisite]] is what Neyne is referring to. The table makes sense to me, but "Stat Type" could be changed to "Stat Value" to accurately reflect what it is. --[[User:Morgul|Morgul]] 16:16, 15 February 2007 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 17:16, 15 February 2007
I don't understand the table you added, Neyne. What do the values represent? You're distinguishing 'Prime Req' and 'Other'. I'm assuming by prime req you mean the primary stat for a certain class, and by other you mean the other four. And then, in order to raise the value from stat value A to stat value B, where B is listed in the colored part of the table, it costs what is listed below?
I'd say it'd make a lot more sense to specify the cost it would require to raise your stat from value A to value B, with A in the table above the cost to raise. But, again, I'm not sure which of the two you're using here. I like the idea of a table like this, though. --Llanor 07:42, 15 February 2007 (CST)
Prime Requisite is what Neyne is referring to. The table makes sense to me, but "Stat Type" could be changed to "Stat Value" to accurately reflect what it is. --Morgul 16:16, 15 February 2007 (CST)
