Difference between revisions of "User talk:Llanor"
m |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Oh dear! Yes, an object's type given by the identify spell does not necessarily match the category name that this object is put in... See [[:Category: Object Types |Object Types]]. 'Armor' is in Armor but 'potion' is in Potions and 'weapon' is in Melee Weapons and so forth. Hmmm... That's a problem alright... --[[User:DaveGarber1975|Dave Garber]] 20:01, 7 February 2007 (CST) | Oh dear! Yes, an object's type given by the identify spell does not necessarily match the category name that this object is put in... See [[:Category: Object Types |Object Types]]. 'Armor' is in Armor but 'potion' is in Potions and 'weapon' is in Melee Weapons and so forth. Hmmm... That's a problem alright... --[[User:DaveGarber1975|Dave Garber]] 20:01, 7 February 2007 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I spent a while today poking around some of the categories and I have some suggested changes for the Area Quick-Links Table, as well as some tentative ideas for at least one more. I'll submit these ideas to you before I make any significant changes to anything, though. --[[User:DaveGarber1975|Dave Garber]] 20:10, 7 February 2007 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | P.S. I kinda understand how you feel about my changing your templates significantly without talking to you first. Come to think of it, I probably had similar feelings about your unexpectedly changing my category structure around a bit. *lol* Once again, my apologies. --[[User:DaveGarber1975|Dave Garber]] 20:10, 7 February 2007 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 21:10, 7 February 2007
Fantastic job with the Bladedancer pages, MooNFisH! --Dave Garber 17:42, 5 February 2007 (CST)
Great idea with the Delete template! Perhaps it will help Waite some. I may add/remove some things to the Delete list, though. Kudos! --Dave Garber 15:01, 6 February 2007 (CST)
Sorry. I spent tons of hours working on the category structure here, tinkering with things and rearranging things and trying to figure out how best to organize things as best as I could. Although Waite helped and gave me quite a bit of feedback, it's mostly my baby; I'm sorry if I'm a bit more attached to it than it should be--I need to be careful about that and learn how to collaborate better. Also, I got in a habit that, anytime new items are added, I check to see if they're categorized "correctly" and make changes if necessary. I put grandfathered objects somewhat off to themselves, not listed under any of the other Armor, Melee Weapon, Potion, Container, etc. categories like those items that are still obtainable--but I can't see any reason not to do put them in these categories, either, especially if it's more efficient to allow the template to do this automatically. I wrote what I did a bit too hastily. I'm very sorry. It seems that I need to communicate with you better and I'm sorry for failing to do a better job of this so far. --Dave Garber 19:48, 7 February 2007 (CST)
Oh dear! Yes, an object's type given by the identify spell does not necessarily match the category name that this object is put in... See Object Types. 'Armor' is in Armor but 'potion' is in Potions and 'weapon' is in Melee Weapons and so forth. Hmmm... That's a problem alright... --Dave Garber 20:01, 7 February 2007 (CST)
I spent a while today poking around some of the categories and I have some suggested changes for the Area Quick-Links Table, as well as some tentative ideas for at least one more. I'll submit these ideas to you before I make any significant changes to anything, though. --Dave Garber 20:10, 7 February 2007 (CST)
P.S. I kinda understand how you feel about my changing your templates significantly without talking to you first. Come to think of it, I probably had similar feelings about your unexpectedly changing my category structure around a bit. *lol* Once again, my apologies. --Dave Garber 20:10, 7 February 2007 (CST)
