Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tanking In Hit Gear"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "I think your math is off on this bit part: "When runed it's virtually the same as a double-brilled LeMans Family Seal, making it an ideal replacement" base AC (12) + natural mo...") |
|||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | I think your math is off on this | + | I think your math is off on this part: |
"When runed it's virtually the same as a double-brilled LeMans Family Seal, making it an ideal replacement" | "When runed it's virtually the same as a double-brilled LeMans Family Seal, making it an ideal replacement" | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Trading 13 AC for 10 HR/DR is still a pretty good deal, but not quite as good as you make it out to be. [[User:Waite|Waite]] 10:23, 9 March 2012 (EST) | Trading 13 AC for 10 HR/DR is still a pretty good deal, but not quite as good as you make it out to be. [[User:Waite|Waite]] 10:23, 9 March 2012 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Ack yes, you're right of course, too much distractions. Thanx for checking. --[[User:WinterRose|WinterRose]] 10:08, 9 March 2012 (CST) | ||
Latest revision as of 22:08, 14 March 2012
I think your math is off on this part:
"When runed it's virtually the same as a double-brilled LeMans Family Seal, making it an ideal replacement"
base AC (12) + natural modifier (10) + dbrill (6) = 28
2 AC runes = 15
Trading 13 AC for 10 HR/DR is still a pretty good deal, but not quite as good as you make it out to be. Waite 10:23, 9 March 2012 (EST)
- Ack yes, you're right of course, too much distractions. Thanx for checking. --WinterRose 10:08, 9 March 2012 (CST)
